Category Archives: Film Complaints

Film Complaint: Speed Racer

I was really surprised by how boring Speed Racer was. Yes, it’s by the Wachowski Brothers (of The Matrix fame). Yes, it has a ton of CGI. Yes, there’s plenty of racing “action.” And I even saw this in IMAX at the Bridge! But YAWN! I almost took a nap.

Unlike Iron Man, I felt like I was perhaps missing out on a lot of inside jokes or a fuller experience by not being a fan of the cartoon on which the movie was based. I couldn’t connect with what was going on on-screen. By the middle of the movie, I stopped caring.

Anyway, I lust after fast cars, drool over exotics and get goosebumps from the sound of a powerful engine. But here? Speed’s Mach 5 and Racer X’s Shooting Star did nothing to ignite that desire. And thus the races were just as hollow. Maybe because I’m familiar with cars it was hard for me to suspend disbelief. But I’ve heard other people say that they, too, didn’t find the racing scenes exciting in the least. Surely a disappointment considering that’s basically what the whole movie is about.

From ReelViews:

At an exceedingly long 135 minutes, the film needs more than what might result from the explosion of a Crayola factory, and Speed Racer has nothing extra to offer — no heart, no excitement, no moments to cherish.

So, yeah, if you want to see a really good blockbuster this weekend, go see Iron Man. But if you’re stuck babysitting a bunch of 10-year-olds hopped up on gummy bears, take them to see Speed Racer. All the fast action, shiny cars and sweeping video game-esque landscape will mesmerize them. And if there are story elements they have trouble following. Not to worry as the movie had the bad habit of overexplaining things with flashbacks. I hate that.

Film Complaint: Beowulf in 3D

WARNING: Ultra violence, gore and “nudity” in the above trailer.

I’ll keep this short. This movie sucks. Sure, seeing it in 3D was pretty cool but that novelty wore off pretty fast during that first scene in the mead hall where Danes were getting their limbs torn off and flung about by Grendel. Blech! Mind the falling torso! Apart from that interesting bit of technology? Boooring. Lonnnng and boring.

By the time you get to that part they keep showing in the trailer where Beowulf is yelling something about how this is Sparta, I mean, how he. Is. Beowulf. you just don’t care. He’s a bad ass. So what?

And maybe you think, “Well at least there’s Angelina Jolie to look forward to,” but you’d be wrong. Even she’s not enough to keep things interesting. She’s naked in 3D and dripping in gold and speaks with an oddly placed Russian accent, but meh. I’m sure even the young men who had flocked to the show we went to at the Bridge were disappointed.

From Salon.com:

Beowulf is ambitious, overbearing and hollow; it goes overboard to impress, yet it never feels truly inventive or imaginative.

Dotsara and I had a couple of cocktails at 12 Lounge before we went to see this movie and then worried that maybe watching it in 3D while buzzed wasn’t such a good idea. But in the end we decided that drinking more could have helped…immensely.

Anyway, her review was, “If you want to see a pretty cool 3D movie with crappy pacing and an even worse story: go see Beowulf.”

However, if you just want to take in a good movie, period, check out No Country for Old Men instead. Now THAT’s a movie I can’t stop thinking about. And it just seems to get better the more I think about it.

Beowulf, on the other hand, has the opposite effect. It just makes me angry and annoyed. What a gloriously, visually stunning waste of time.

Film Complaint: Transformers

I had to see Transformers. I owed it to my inner child, the one who is still and will always be fascinated with bright, shiny transforming aliens. And I knew that if I really wanted to see the Autobots and Decepticons slugfest I had to endure Michael Bay’s inane directing as well as the masses of opening day chair-kicking, whooping-in-the-aisles, yelling-at-the-screen movie-goers.

But damn, I hate Michael Bay. He is everything that is wrong with modern filmmaking. Armageddon, Pearl Harbor, The Island were all his and those are just the ones he directed. Forget about the trash he produced. Is he getting worse or is it just me?

Read the full article »

Film Complaint: Match Point

Match Point
“Was that just as bad for you as it was for me?”

My friend Bee had access to a preview copy of Match Point so we did a movie night in with hors d’oeuvres and key lime pie martinis. Thing is we shouldn’t have picked a Woody Allen movie turned thriller for our Friday night of mindless fun. Especially a Woody Allen movie that I hated just from its trailer alone.

And, wow, did I hate this movie after actually sitting through it. But I stuck through it to its incredulously uninteresting end. First off, are you kidding me with a fay Jonathan Rhys-Myers as the rakish tennis player? He and Scarlett Johansson had no chemistry whatsoever. “Why’s the gay guy having sex with that lady?” we kept asking the TV screen through the various “love” scenes. When they hooked up for the first time? Not. Hot. At. All. Watching them hook up the second, third, etc. time? Just plain weird. “Come on! He’s sooo gay!”

And Emily Mortimer as Jonathan’s beard, er, wife was just damn irritating. Always with the whining about wanting a baby and shouting out his name in her effort to locate him in her parents’ ginormous mansion. “CHRIS! CHRIS! WHERE ARE YOU? I don’t understand, he was just here. CHRIS? CHRIS!” If he isn’t answering you, he doesn’t want to be found! Her character was supposed to be sweet and innocent but rather she just came across as incredibly dumb.

Scarlett Johansson was annoying as fuck, too. What happened to her since Lost in Translation? I LOVED her in that movie and she was even pretty good in Girl With the Pearl Earring.

At it again
    But, here? When her character first meets Chris, she overdoes the “I’m so sexy, you find me sexy don’t you?” with her slightly parted lips and batting eyelashes. Get over yourself! “She probably found one expression she did well and now just sticks with it,” Bee hypothesized.

Scarlett uses that parted lips expression EVERYWHERE–in that Eternity perfume commercial, on the red carpet, and even in sci-fi movie posters! We get it, you have really thick lips and like to breathe through your mouth.

Yeah, I just didn’t like anybody in this movie and I especially despise Woody Allen for bringing out the true annoyingness of his actors. No one was likable and I wasn’t rooting for anybody. Did Allen mean for it to be like that? I don’t see what purpose that would serve since by the time we got to the twist in the story, we just didn’t care all that much. And speaking of said twist, I won’t give anything away but Chris’ solution to his problem just came out of nowhere. Where’s the psychological buildup?

Oh! And the soundtrack sucked ass, too! I love opera as much as the next girl, especially vintage opera songs, but their use throughout this movie was distractingly alien to the action on the screen making it seem really pretentious.

I just don’t understand how this movie scored a 78% on Rottentomatoes.com. I DO, however, agree with Salon.com when they said, “… from the casting to the dialogue, Match Point just feels pickled in artificiality.”

People applaud Woody Allen for finally getting out of New York and making a movie that so goes against his oeuvre, but after watching this I’m thinking, “Maybe you should just stick with what you know. Neurotic comedies based in Manhattan.”

Film Complaint: Prime: Heyy, This Isn’t a Comedy!

Bryan Greenberg and Uma Thurman in Prime
Don’t know what’s so funny here.

Warning: Spoiler to follow.

It was a Sunday after two nights of crazy Halloween partying and I just wanted to enjoy a harmless, mindless movie. A comedy. I remembered the commercials for Prime: “older” woman dates much younger man and tells all to her therapist, only to find out that ::gasp!:: her therapist is her new lover’s mother. Sounds fun.

We went to the Arclight, stood in the ticket line alongside Dave Navarro and clingy but cute Carmen Electra, and paid the $14.

OK, I usually judge a movie by the previews since I figure they pick them according to the target audience. Hmmm, one stupid movie preview after another. That Nanny McPhee movie looks so uninteresting. Oh yeah, there was some seemingly Fatal Attractionesque film directed by Woody Allen of all people and starring Scarlett Johansson. Audience: “Wha-?”

Prime itself started off promising. Uma Thurman is adorable as the just-divorced Rafi who stumbles into a love affair with a 23-year-old. Nice! And Meryl Streep is such an amazing actor. Just her little reactions to certain situations, things that you take for granted and then think, “Of course that’s how a person in her situation would react.” Anyway, what started off as a romantic Woody Allen-type comedy quickly disintegrated into a very sad love story. I mean sad as in melancholy, not pathetic. I thought that maybe the lovers would overcome the overprotective mother and society’s restrictions on them…but they don’t. And in the end, to drive home the point that it didn’t work out, they play the saddest version I ever heard of “I Wish You Love.” Such a beautiful rendition by Rachael Yamagata.

My friend and I walked out of the theater in tears. It made us think of our own travails in love and as Meryl Streep’s character said, “You love, you move on, and that’s OK.” Stupidly simple but true. Anyway, you could wait for this movie to come out on DVD. No need to rush to the theater. It’s quiet, some funny moments but nothing special. Definitely don’t see it if you feel depressed and want a laugh as it ends on a sad note, like, “Oh well, such is life.” Rottentomatoes.com gave it a rotten 46% out of 100%.